|
Millions of people gather for an event as important as the World Cup, this time in Russia where 32 national teams compete in 11 cities, the opportunity to lift the trophy in Moscow.
On this occasion, FIFA has granted Russia the right to host such a great event, as well as to host the World Cup without adopting due diligence measures in matters of human rights. According to Amnesty International, "FIFA marked a famous own goal that since then he has tried to overcome.
Human Rights in the 2018 World Cup in Russia
In Russia, human rights are AQB Directory increasingly impossible to ignore, since it is increasingly common to know about human rights violations committed in that country.
One of Amnesty International's concerns about the World Cup is the harassment, intimidation, physical attacks and constant arbitrary detentions to which those who try to defend human rights are subjected.
Harassment, intimidation, physical attacks and arbitrary detentions are constant concerns for human rights defenders: Amnesty International.
Tweet this phrase.
"Russia has further restricted the right to freedom of assembly, using the World Cup as a pretext in some cases"

Since Russia was named host country of the World Cup in late 2010, there has been a deterioration in the security of human rights defenders in the country, where NGOs and their staff have suffered physical attacks, among other attacks.
Human rights have also been violated in the North Caucasus; the homophobic law against “propaganda” with which LGBTI people are persecuted and stigmatized; the witch hunt launched against gays in Chechnya; the decriminalization of domestic violence; targeted attacks on journalists; and Russia's continued use of its veto to block UN Security Council initiatives on Syria.
Human Rights: FIFA
According to Amnesty International, it is evident that the Russian authorities are doing everything they can to turn the country into a human rights black hole, however, "it is necessary to know what FIFA itself is doing not only to question the host country on this matter, but to improve its own human rights record.
|
|